Showing posts with label Terrorism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Terrorism. Show all posts

Monday, September 17, 2007

More evidence of Iranian collusion in Taliban arms

The evidence continues to mount...

An Iranian arms shipment destined for the Taliban was intercepted Sept. 6 by the international force in Afghanistan in what appears to be an escalating flow of weaponry between the two former enemies, according to officials from countries in the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force.

The shipment included armor-piercing bombs known as explosively formed projectiles, the sources said, which have been especially deadly when used as roadside bombs against foreign troops in Iraq. The NATO-led force interdicted two smaller shipments of similar weapons from Iran into southern Helmand province April 11 and May 3.

"It's not the fact that it's qualitatively different, but this was a large shipment which got people's attention," a U.S. official in Washington said of the most recent interception.

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Thursday, July 26, 2007

Iran 'training Iraqi mortar men'

Here's some evidence, but will anybody ever prosecute the Iranian regime?

Looks doubtful.

Militias firing rockets and mortars on Baghdad's heavily protected Green Zone have become more accurate because of training in Iran, the US military says.
The comments were made by Lt-Gen Raymond Odierno, one of the top US commanders in Iraq.

It is the latest in a series of accusations made by the US about the alleged training and arming of Iraqi Shia militiamen by Iran.

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

What's the point...

...of 'talking' to the Iranian regime, if afterwards we criticize them for what we already knew was true? These thugs only understand things in their own language.

The news item I'm referring to can be found here: US accuses Iran after Iraq talks.

Iran has increased support for militia groups in Iraq in recent months, the US ambassador in Baghdad has said.

Ryan Crocker spoke after meeting his Iranian counterpart for rare talks on Iraq's security crisis, only the second direct meeting in almost three decades.

Washington blames Tehran for fomenting violence in Iraq, while the Iranians are demanding the US withdraws troops.

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

US acts against groups aiding Hezbollah

Some movement from the Bush administration. Funny, it always seems to come from the financial side of things...god forbid they actually try to do something overtly & directly against the mullahs and for the Iranian people...


The Bush administration took action Tuesday against an Iran-based foundation, including its U.S. branch, for allegedly providing support to Hezbollah, a terrorist group the United States has blamed for bloodshed in the Middle East.

The Treasury Department's action covers the Martyrs Foundation and Goodwill Charitable Organization of Dearborn, Mich., which the government identified as a fundraising office for the foundation.

"We will not allow organizations that support terrorism to raise money in the United States," said Stuart Levey, the Treasury Department's under secretary for terrorism and financial intelligence.

The government also moved against al-Qard al-Hassan, a Beirut firm that the U.S. government believes was used by Hezbollah "as a cover to manage its financial activity."

Two Lebanese people - Qasem Aliq and Ahmad al-Shami - also were covered by Tuesday's order.

More evidence of Iran's deconstructive activities in Iraq

Anyone listening? Doesn't appear so.

Here's the story: "US: Weapons Smugglers with Iran Links Nabbed in Iraq"

And another: "Chinese Missiles Smuggled Through Iran into Iraq"

You have to laugh...

...when you see headlines like these (of all places, on Fox News!).

"US to Set-up Regional Security Subcommittee with Iran and Iraq"

Needless to say, there is 0% chance that the Iranian regime would actually help the US with the security issues in Iraq and the region as they are the ones causing the major problems on a national level. This is the classic two-faced strategy of Iranian politics, which I can't believe anyone - especially the US - is still falling for. Wake up guys!

Friday, July 20, 2007

'Iranian-linked militant' among dozens captured in Iraq raids

Gee, I wonder what the US military's reaction was when they learned of this surprising news? Shock & Awe? I wish we saw more of that...

Yahoo! News has the story.

Another Israeli has it right

Here's what Meridor said:

Israel's ambassador to the United States, Sallai Meridor, said Wednesday that Israel and the free world are under attack by Iran, with a combination of fanaticism, terrorism and nuclear capability posing the most serious threat since the 1930s.

"We must prevent this nightmare," Meridor said at the "Night to Honor Israel" event, part of the second annual Christians United for Israel summit in Washington, D.C. "The world must act and act now."

Meridor said Israel would take any steps necessary to ensure that Iran does not develop a nuclear bomb. "All options are on the table, and no matter what, they will not be able to get a nuclear weapon," he said.

Iran: Cancel televised ‘confessions’

Human Rights Watch reports:

The Iranian government should cancel the scheduled July 18 broadcast of the “confessions” of two detained Iranian-Americans, Human Rights Watch said today. Human Rights Watch expressed concern that Iranian authorities have used coercive means to compel Haleh Esfandiari and Kian Tajbakhsh to make statements that may be later used to incriminate them in court.

On July 16, 2007, Iranian television announced that Channel One would broadcast the “confessions” of Esfandiari and Tajbakhsh at 9:45 p.m. on July 18 and July 19. The authorities have held them in largely incommunicado detention for more than two months, preventing lawyers and family members from visiting them. They have only been permitted brief phone calls to family members.

“Public ‘confessions’ of this kind are a shameful tactic used by oppressive governments around the world,” said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East director at Human Rights Watch. “It’s a way for governments to intimidate critical voices into silence and flaunt their disregard for fundamental rights.”

A couple great cartoons from C&F this week


Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Great article from Michael Ledeen: 'Listen to the Military'

I would highly recommend reading his latest instalment on the current situation of the Middle East. You can find the full article here. Some excerpts are copied below for convenience.

In short, the president sees that it is a regional war, as it has been from the beginning, just as our enemies in Damascus and Tehran publicly told us it would be, even before a single American soldier set foot in Iraq. The two biggest causes of casualties in Iraq are non-indigenous: suicide bombers and constantly improving explosive devices deployed in and alongside roads. Eighty to ninety percent of all suicide bombers are foreigners (mostly Saudis who are trained in Syria), not Iraqis, and the explosives have long been known to be of Iranian design to contain Iranian components, and often constructed in Iran (see the latest intelligence news about al Qaeda reconstituting in Iran).

Moreover, the spinal column of the terror army in Iraq is intimately linked to Iran and Syria. As U.S. Army Brig. Gen. Kevin Bergner recently put it, our recent successes in Iraq have been accomplished despite ongoing resistance from al-Qaeda, proxy groups like the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and their Lebanese Hezbollah surrogates. Bergner stressed that the activities of these Iranian forces, and joint instruments of Iran and Syria such as Hezbollah, are relentlessly increasing. “we’ve actually been very forthright in explaining the role that those groups are having and they are an increasing problem — one that’s having an increasingly destabilizing effect on both the government of Iraq and creating more problems for us to deal with.”

With all that, Bergner insisted “that there is no question that al Qaeda is the principle fueler of violence and sectarian attacks,” and is therefore our main target. But it is indisputable — and further information is emerging every day to confirm this — that al Qaeda itself is hardly an independent actor. Several years ago, Spanish judge Baltazar Garçon noted that the leaders of al Qaeda reconstituted their headquarters in Iran after being driven from Afghanistan. I wrote at the time that Osama bin Laden and key members of his family had gone to Iran, and other key figures, such as Zarqawi (the leader of al Qaeda in Iraq, lest we forget), had created an international terror network from Tehran. I have no doubt that when we finally unravel the terror network, we will find that people like Zarqawi repeatedly went back and forth between Iraq, Syria, and Iran, as did — and does — arch terrorists like Imad Mughniyah of Hezbollah....

...Yes, our troops are magnificent (as New York Times reporter John Burns so well put it), and the Iraqi people are also magnificent (their courage and patience are inspirational, and if the Nobel Committee were up to its task, it would award the Peace Prize to the Iraqi nation, excluding the terrorists of course). But fighting brilliantly in Iraq alone cannot possibly win such a vast war. Bill Kristol knows that, which is why he says “we will have to do more...but we can.” Yes, we can. But will we? There is still no sign of that, and there are screams of horror at the very thought that we might support freedom in Iran, where significant numbers of people daily demonstrate their willingness to fight their oppressors.

Instead, every new revelation about Iran’s role in the terror war is greeted with the pathetic mantra “but this does not prove that the regime itself is involved.” As if General Suleimani of the Revolutionary Guards’ Quds Force would dare launch operation after operation against us in Iraq without the explicit approval of his commander-in-chief, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Do our analysts not know that the Revolutionary Guards were created for the explicit purpose of responding to the whims of the Supreme Leader? Whenever the Guards move, they do so precisely because “the regime” has willed it.

Big wars require big strategies, and we do not have one. Yet. I believe the country would support one if the case were made clearly and honestly. Taking the war to our enemies in Damascus and Tehran does not require troops on the ground or bombs from the air, except in the limited cases of terrorist training camps and weapons factories. It requires, above all, two things: support for the democratic forces in Syria and Iran, and the will to confront our enemies. That will can be easily expressed, but no president has had the coherence and courage to do that. Iran has been at war with us for nearly thirty years, but no president has ever said we want an end to the terror regime in Tehran.

It’s long past time to hear those words.

UK: Iran supplying arms to the Taliban

Well there's a shocker! Surprised the mullah-enablers even mentioned it.

"We have successfully interdicted the transfer of arms across the Iranian border into the southern part of Afghanistan. To my knowledge, on at least two occasions—perhaps even more—we have identified markings on weaponry that suggest that it had its origins in Iran," British Defence Secretary Des Browne told Parliament.

Browne said that the international community ought to make it clear to the Iranians that their actions in Afghanistan were "unacceptable".

Iran’s terror war against the US in Iraq

Somebody else who is on the right trail....Alireza Jafarzadeh, a Fox News foreign affairs analyst. His recent article starts like this:

Iran’s broad and destructive activities in Iraq are bringing renewed attention to the Iranian regime’s longstanding role as the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. As it continues to fund Shi’ia militias in Iraq and deliver weapons such as IEDs to the insurgency, Tehran is also escalating its presence in the Middle East as part of its goal to export Islamic fundamentalist rule throughout the Muslim world.

Earlier this month, Sen. Joseph Lieberman discussed this issue in the Wall Street Journal, summarizing that “Iran is acting aggressively and consistently to undermine moderate regimes in the Middle East, establish itself as the dominant regional power and reshape the region in its own ideological image.”

New intelligence out of Iran reveals that Tehran has instituted several new strategies for building its presence in the neighboring region. According to my sources associated with the National Council of Resistance of Iran — the same group that revealed the secret nuclear facilities in Natanz and Ark in 2002 and many additional, validated facts about Iran’s nuclear program and activities in Iraq — one of these tactics is the covert militarization of Iran’s diplomatic corps.

Pathetic: Musharraf begs Taliban to let him appease them

This comes from Hot Air:

“It’s a policy of appeasement,” the Pakistani general in charge of the tribal areas said last month of the “peace treaty” Musharraf signed with the pro-Taliban elders in the region. It’s also now been torn up in the wake of the Red Mosque assault by the local jihadis, who, to punctuate the schism, killed more than 70 Pakistanis over the weekend.

Mush’s reaction? Beg them for reconciliation.

Monday, July 16, 2007

Bill Clinton's clemency for terrorists

How soon we forget. Clinton chides Bush for his behavior, but look at his own record...

The blatant hypocrisy of the man who would once again share the White House is breathtaking. No, I'm not alluding to the fact that Bill Clinton was impeached in 1998 over perjury allegations surrounding the Monica Lewinski affair. I'm not pointing to the fact that he pardoned 140 people on Jan. 20, 2001, his last day in office. That list included his half brother Roger, his former HUD Secretary Henry Cisneros and of course Marc Rich. No, I'm going back to what President Bill Clinton did in August of 1999.

Against the advice of his Justice Department and against the advice of the FBI, Clinton offered conditional clemency to 16 jailed members of the FALN. In the 1970s and early 1980s this Puerto Rican terrorist group set off more than 130 bombs in the U.S. and Puerto Rico. In January of 1975 they blew up Fraunces Tavern during lunchtime here in New York City. That blast killed four and injured 60 more.

Why let these thugs out of prison after we had seen the first World Trade Center bombing, the U.S. Embassy bombings in Africa, and the bombing of the USS Cole under Bill Clinton's watch? He said at the time that the 16 in question were not actually involved in killing anyone.

Yet they were all convicted on charges of conspiracy to commit robbery, bomb-making and sedition, as well as firearms and explosives violations. In fact a federal prosecutor was quoted back in November of 1999 as saying that the 16 FALN members were busted by the FBI while making bombs and planning to blow up military offices and rob a Chicago Transit Authority fare collector.

Clinton also defended his actions by noting that to accept clemency, each terrorist had to sign a form denouncing terrorism and violence.

Some feel that Bill Clinton did this to help his wife in her run for the U.S. Senate seat from New York the following year. It was supposed to get her the Hispanic vote, although I'm not sure how exactly.

Good for Bulgaria

They've imposed an arms embargo on Iran.

Bulgaria’s Cabinet has decided to put an arms embargo on Iran, Liberia and Somalia.

The embargo will be in accordance with a resolution by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) and the opinion of the Council of the European Union, Focus news agency reported.

The international community introduced a series of restrictions on Iran and the arms embargo is a consequent restriction, Focus said.

Good news: Brits give laptop to imprisoned cyberjihadi

Pretty hard to believe...if it didn't happen in England, that is. Hot Air reports:

He and his two cybercronies pleaded guilty last week to inciting murder over the Internet. They found 37,000 stolen credit card numbers in his apartment harvested from viruses and phish e-mails and estimate that he and his pals racked up $3.5 million in fraudulent charges used to buy supplies for the jihad. Money was laundered through online gambling sites. They also were known to hack into sites and use their bandwidth to host jihadi videos, and on one of their computers the cops found “short video clips of the U.S. Capitol grounds, the World Bank building, a hazardous chemical response vehicle and local fuel storage facilities. Also on the laptop were instant message chat logs and a PowerPoint presentation detailing how to build a car bomb.” It was a sophisticated, potentially lethal operation.

So naturally the cops gave one of them a laptop while they were awaiting trial. What could go wrong?

Sunday, July 15, 2007

Iran's destabilization of Iraq

More evidence pours in...I spoke to a soldier who was based on and off in Iraq for 3 years, and he said that while there are lots of little factions fighting for control over different regions of Iraq, the only groups that are properly organized and effective on a national level and in Baghdad are the ones known to be sponsored by the Islamic Republic. Stories like this just add weight to observations like his.

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Imam accused in JFK plot wanted help from Iran

Gee, well there's a surprise. Any major terrorist attach aimed at the US and associated with Islam that is well organized most likely stems back to the mullahs in Iran in some way or form...the NY Post has the story.

A Shiite imam accused of plotting to blow up fuel tanks at John F. Kennedy International Airport wanted to seek Iranian backing for the terrorist plot.
The disclosure came yesterday in a court decision denying bail to the Trinidadian-based cleric,
Kareem Ibrahim.

Mr. Ibrahim, 62, is one of four men arrested last month on charges connected to the plot. At the time, American law enforcement officials said Mr. Ibrahim encouraged his co-conspirators to seek funding for the attack from outside their home countries of Trinidad or Guyana. While American authorities have not provided more details, a judge in Trinidad wrote that evidence, including tape recordings, suggests Mr. Ibrahim intended to seek backing for the plot from individuals in Iran or Britain.

In those recordings, Judge Prakash Moosai wrote, Mr. Ibrahim "refers to an ‘Iranian brother' passing through Trinidad and Tobago, and of sending a ‘trusted brother' to Iran to speak to the top men of the revolutionary movement there about the plan." The judge's decision does not clarify whether "the revolutionary movement there" refers to the government of the Islamic Republic. Nor does Judge Moosai state whether the plotters actually disclosed the plan to contacts in Iran or simply considered doing so. Mr. Ibrahim also spoke of contacting "brothers in England," the decision said.

Mr. Ibrahim's alleged efforts to find foreign backing mark the second Iran connection to surface in a case that initially appeared confined to the Western Hemisphere. At the time of his arrest, another of the defendants, Abdul Kadir of Guyana, was preparing to travel to Iran to attend an Islamic conference, according to news reports. Two of Mr. Kadir's children were studying in Iran at the time of his arrest, according to reports.